Letter from the editor
Editorial
World AIDS Day 2008 saw a turning point in the way leadership in South
Africa is addressing HIV and AIDS. For the first time in history government,
business and labour spoke with a united voice and called for action to halt
the spread of new infections. There were no arguments about who caused the
epidemic, why we have an epidemic, how it should be treated and where the
money should go. The message and theme for WAD 2008 from the SA National
AIDS Council, the Deputy President, the Minister of Health and Cosatu was
simple and clear: “Leadership and unity. Individual and
collective action to stop HIV and AIDS.” As we reflect on
2008, we can ask ourselves as business in SA whether we have failed or
succeeded in addressing the impact of HIV and AIDS. Have we been successful
in our workplace programmes this year? Have we made a big enough
contribution to the communities within which we operate in? Being business
men and women, we would also like to follow the formal route of doing such
an assessment instead of relying on opinions and hear say evidence. The
monitoring and evaluation of our HIV and AIDS workplace programmes is
crucial for us to ensure that we are achieving our goals, obtaining returns
on our investment and ensuring that we can motivate ongoing budget
allocations for HIV and AIDS in the workplace. This
edition of AAAO focuses on Monitoring and Evaluation. See our Research and
NSP Fact file to obtain a better understanding of what we mean with M&E.
Linzi Smith, an expert on management system standards provides us with a
great summary on what management system standards are, and introduces us to
the HIV and AIDS workplace management system standard, SANS16001: 2007. This
standard is an excellent tool to help us achieve best practice in our HIV
and AIDS workplace programmes. From the AAAO editorial
board and the Metropolitan team, we would like to wish you a wonderful
Festive Season. Drive safely and remember to use a condom.
Nathea
back to top >>/a>
Monitoring and evaluation: Utilising Management System Standards to monitor and evaluate HIV and AIDS workplace programmes.
By Linzi Smith
Managing Director of Education, Training and Counselling (ETC)
What is a Management System Standard?
-
Management System Standards consist of a set of absolute requirements
for achieving specific outcomes through actions deemed to be in line
with currently accepted best practice.
-
These
outcomes must be objectively verifiable by an auditor trained in the
specific field being audited.
-
Formal
management system standards are created by National Standards bodies
such as SANS (South African National Standards)
-
All
management system standards are based on the philosophy of continuous
improvement
-
Consists of interrelated components all working together to achieve
specific outcomes
Most HIV programmes have isolated components that do not interrelate or
complement one another. An HIV and AIDS management system
will bring all
the components of your HIV programme together to ensure that they are
all working towards achieving the targets and objectives and success
criteria set out in your Policy and Strategic Plan.
The picture below depicts all the components required
for a VW Golf. The components however are not working together. As long as
they remain separate, the car will not be a car.

Most HIV & AIDS programmes do not have all the components
required for a management system. There is some information and awareness,
some HIV testing and some treatment, care and support. Many of these
programmes are operating in isolation and do not feed into or support one
another.
Management System Standards are therefore:
A benchmark of achievement based on a desired and stated level of excellence
which includes both qualitative and quantitative data.
How do management system standards work?
-
First,
they are designed to mitigate risk.
-
Second,
they are written in collaboration with stakeholders (technical experts,
consumers, industry and regulators), working together to define best
practice.
-
Third, they are regularly updated to
stay abreast of best practice. The
year immediately after the number of the standard denotes the latest
updated version. E.g. SANS 16001:2007 or OHSAS 18001:2007
-
Fourth, and most importantly they can be audited and verified by a
recognized certification body. This ensures top management buy in,
leadership, commitment and accountability and prevents ‘window dressing’
or ‘lip service’.
Professionals in the HIV & AIDS field are mostly unfamiliar with
management system standards.
Fields such as Quality Management, Environmental management and Occupational
Health and Safety management are however very familiar with management
system standards, the most common of which are:
ISO 9001 – Quality
ISO 14001 - Environment
OHSAS 18001 – Occupational Health and Safety
SA 8000 – Social responsibility
ISO 27001 – Information security
ISO TS 16949 – Automotive quality
ISO 22000 – Food safety
SANS 16001:2007 – HIV and AIDS workplace management system standard
SANS 16001:2007 was launched in July 2007 by the SABS (South African Bureau
of Standards) as a workplace response to the hyper-endemic epidemic
experienced here in Southern Africa.
SANS 16001 is compatible with the most commonly utilised management systems
in business, namely: ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. This makes the
SANS 16001 management system easy to introduce into an already entrenched
and accepted business management system. The introduction of systems that
are too different from already existing business systems causes resistance
from operations as HIV & AIDS management is still not accepted as a business
imperative as it is not deemed ‘core business’.
The standard (like all other management system standards) operates within a
continuous improvement cycle: The APIME cycle.
A = Assessment (of HIV & AIDS related risk and current interventions)
P = Planning (based on the assessment utilising the logic model)
I = Implementation (of the plan to achieve outcome and impact indicators)
M = Monitoring (continuous monitoring of the plan and implementation to
immediately identify problems and to ensure the plan is executed)
E = Evaluation of outcome and impact indicators for return on investment,
reduction of new infections and effective management of those already
infected.
The final evaluation is done by carrying out a certification audit.
There are a total of 28 clauses and sub-clauses contained within the SANS
16001 Standard that an organisation must achieve in order to gain
certification.
Risk based certification auditing provides:
- Excellent information
to top management regarding the gaps between commitment, reporting and
actual responses and achievements.
- Improves the
organization’s ability to meet their stated strategic and operational
targets and objectives and outcome and impact indicators.
- Prevents ‘window
dressing’ and ‘lip service’.
Steps for organisations wishing to align their HIV workplace
programmes to SANS 16001:2007
1. Top management is to make the decision to align their HIV programme to
SANS 16001 and communicate such decision to all stakeholders.
2. Appoint one or more employees to establish, implement, monitor and
continually improve upon the HIV & AIDS management system and communicate
such appointment to all stakeholders.
3. Send the appointee/s on SANS 16001 Implementation training
4. It takes about 1 year for a well entrenched HIV programme to align
against the Standard and about 18 months to 2 years for a company without
any existing HIV programme. This does however depend on the size of the
company, the level of commitment to achieve certification and if other
management systems are already in place (this makes it easier to establish
SANS 16001)
5. Contract a SANS 16001 auditor to carry out an internal audit (this is a
requirement prior to carrying out an external certification audit) or if
your organisation has multiple sites you can train up a few internal
auditors that fit the criteria to do the internal audits. Auditors should
not audit their own work.
6. Correct all non-conformities found by the internal audit
7. Call for the external certification audit
8. Receive certification
9. Maintain the system by continually improving the system and maintaining
certification
Auditors and auditing
Most people are familiar with financial auditors, but unaware that there is
a whole world of management system auditors. These are people who are
technical experts within their field who have been trained to become
auditors in that specific field.
ISO 19011:2002 is the international standard that sets forth:
- A clear explanation of the
principles of management systems auditing.
- Guidance on the
management of audit programmes.
- Guidance on the
conduct of internal or external audits.
- Advice on the competence and evaluation of auditors
All management system
standard auditors training includes ISO 19011 plus the particular standard
that the learner wishes to become an auditor in.
There are two bodies that register such auditors who have complied with and
passed both ISO 19011 and the relevant standard.
The first is IRCA – the International Register of Certified Auditors and
The second is SAATCA – the Southern African Auditors and Training
Certification Association.
Due to low level or concentrated HIV epidemics in the first world, ISO does
not have an HIV & AIDS management system standard (as yet). The SADC region
is the only region in the world with a hyper-endemic epidemic and thus it
makes sense that the South African Bureau of Standards developed a National
HIV & AIDS Workplace Standard. The standard is based on the ISO format and
the ISO requirements for both training of auditors and conduct of audits.
SAATCA is therefore the body that registers and ensures
that SANS 16001 auditors comply with continuous professional
development.
Organisations should be very selective when contracting auditors to do SANS
16001 audits. Some organisations are advertising that they do SANS 16001
auditing or auditor training; however they do not have SAATCA approval or
SAATCA quality control measures in place.
SAATCA registers individual auditors if they comply with
the SANS 16001 criteria as well as approves SANS 16001 auditor training
programmes if the training programme complies with the SAATCA, ISO and IRCA
criteria. Auditor training can only be carried out by a SANS 16001
lead auditor. At this point in time only Linzi Smith (the author of
this article) is registered with SAATCA as a Lead Auditor in the SANS
16001:2007 scheme.
There is however several other technical experts who have been trained as
SANS 16001 auditors and who are currently completing the required number of
hours to gain their registration with SAATCA.
The next SANS 16001:2007 auditors’ course will be in the first week of March
2009 in JHB.
To ensure that SANS 16001 auditors are of the highest quality there are
specific minimum criteria that must be complied with to gain entry to the
auditor’s course. This is to protect organisations from contracting SANS
16001 auditors that are not experts in the field of the management of HIV in
the workplace and thus having no value added to their HIV workplace
programme.
Conclusion
SANS 16001:2007 is not another component to add to your existing HIV
programme. It is the overarching system that all components of your current
programme will fit into in order to achieve current best practice in the
management of HIV and AIDS in the workplace. It is therefore far more than
merely a monitoring and evaluation tool.
Many business leaders have become complacent about HIV & AIDS workplace risk
management due to the epidemic having been around for 28 years now.
What most do not consider is that we moved from having a low level epidemic
up to 1991, then on to a concentrated epidemic from ‘91 to ‘94. We then
moved into a generalised epidemic which means that 5% or more of our adult
population was infected with HIV. We have been in a hyper-endemic epidemic
since 1999. This means that more than 15% of our adult population is
infected with HIV. The SADC region is the ONLY region in the world with a
hyper-endemic epidemic.
We should therefore be asking top management who are not aligning their HIV
programmes against SANS 16001:2007 if they are too afraid or embarrassed to
expose their HIV programmes to external auditors or perhaps they are simply
unaware of the existence of the Standard?
Linzi began her career as a nursing sister at Addington Hospital in KZN where she looked after her first AIDS patient in 1982. She then moved to the Dept. of Health (Local Govt.) where she initiated the HIV & AIDS programme in 1988. She facilitated all aspects of the programme until 2000 when she left to start ETC. ETC provides comprehensive HIV programmes to the workplace (this excludes Disease Management). Linzi has qualifications in General nursing and midwifery from Addington Hospital and went on to study Community Science at Durban University of Technology, Education and Psychiatry both at the University of KZN and the Management of HIV in the workplace at Stellenbosch University. She is currently studying corporate psychology at UNISA. back to top >>
Disclaimer
Copyright subsists in all materials in this publication. You may use the information and print or reproduce materials from this publication only for your own non-commercial personal use.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Metropolitan. As always we encourage responses on any of these issues covered.
Metropolitan takes every possible care and effort to ensure that the information supplied is as accurate and current as possible. However, Metropolitan does not assume any liability and will not in any way whatsoever be held responsible for any liability arising from the use of any information, calculators and advice supplied in this eNewsletter.
|
In this issue
|
Opinion Poll
"Are you encountering recurring HIV and Aids related problems in your business?"
|
Research fact file
EXTRACT FROM: Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Comprehensive HIV and AIDS Care, Management and Treatment Programme for South Africa; National Department of Health, South Africa 2004:5
Monitoring and evaluation is an absolute critical aspect of the plan. Good m&e contributes to ensuring that the objectives of the operational plan are achieved. The role of m&e for planning and good financial management is emphasized in the Public Finance Management Act. Monitoring and evaluation are two complimentary, but separate functions, which often serve distinct purposes. Monitoring is the routine ongoing assessment of activities applied to assess resources invested (inputs) in the programme, services delivered (outputs) by the programme, outcomes that are related to the programme. Evaluation is non-routine assessment and will be concerned with evaluation of programme’s impact on the health and lives of South Africans. The m&e framework adopts a logical approach of input, process, output, outcome and impact indicators to ensure ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the goals and objectives of the National Strategic Plan (NSP).
NSP fact file
EXTRACT FROM: The HIV & AIDS and STI Strategic Plan for South Africa 2007 – 2011 (NSP)
“Key Priority Area 3: Research, Monitoring and Surveillance”
The NSP recognizes that establishing effective systems for monitoring and evaluation are a vital management tool. National, Provincial and District level indicators to monitor inputs, process, outputs, outcomes and impact will be used to assess collective effort. It is recommended that a sustainable budget of between 4% - 7& is dedicated for m&e of the NSP in line with international trends.
Mid-term and Five Year Review
With regard to core indicator monitoring, a mid-term review of the NSP will
be conducted in 2009 and the five-year review should be conducted during 2011.
The review will focus on the following questions:
- What coverage of services for prevention, treatment, care and support and
legal and human rights has already been achieved?
- Which affected populations are not being sufficiently reached?
- What are the major obstacles to reaching these populations?
- What are the strategies to overcome these obstacles?
- What financial, technical and human resources are currently available?
- How can budgets and programmes be adjusted to address these obstacles?
- What process and outcome targets will help move the response forward and help
measure success?
- What additional resources will be required to move significantly towards the
goals of the NSP by 2011?
The five year review would mainly be an outcomes based assessment using data
from multiple sources
HIV AND AIDS VITAL STATISTICS FOR 2008
| AIDS deaths per day | 1000 |
| New HIV infections per day | 1400 |
| People living with HIV | 5,6 million |
| Total AIDS deaths | 370 000 |
| Total new HIV infections | 510 000 |
| Total AIDS sick | 650 000 |
| Adults with AIDS, not on ART | 500 000 |
| Children with AIDS, not on ART | 27 000 |
| Adults on ART | 380 000 |
| Children on ART | 45 000 |
Source: N Nathea Nicolay from ASSA2003 Aids and Demographic model
|